https://blog.goarif.co/content/images/2026/01/transcribe-analysis.webp
transcribe analysis

The Fastest Part of Qualitative Research Shouldn

5 min read

Cornellius Yudha Wijaya

With over 7 years of hands-on experience in data science, I provide specialized consultation in data science, machine learning, and AI implementation.

The Fastest Part of Qualitative Research Shouldn’t Be the Interview

If you’re doing interviews for research, whether you’re on an insights team, a researcher, or an HR or talent acquisition specialist, audio and video interviews can feel like both a goldmine and a burden.

On the one hand, interviews capture everything surveys miss: nuance, hesitation, emotion, and the “why” behind decisions. On the other hand, turning those recordings into something you can analyze is where projects often stall. Across these roles, people describe the same frustrations:

  • “Transcribing takes longer than the interview itself, sometimes much longer.”
  • “I keep replaying the same section because I don’t want to misquote someone.”
  • “Outsourcing saves effort, but I lose days waiting, and I still have to clean the text.”
  • “Even with a transcript, it’s hard to code consistently across multiple interviews.”
  • “If there are more than one speaker, it gets messy fast. Who said what? When?”

That’s the context where tools like ARIF’s Transcribe start to feel less like a “nice to have” and more like a productivity boost.

“I just uploaded the file, and it came back fast enough to keep working.”

Users often describe the first “aha” moment as speed and simplicity. Instead of juggling transcription apps, manual typing, or third, party services, they upload an audio or movie file and get a structured transcript back in minutes (sometimes seconds, depending on length).

One of ARIF’s users uploaded a 55-minute audio file, and ARIF produced the transcript in 22 seconds! This is what speed enables:

  • Same, day debriefs while context is still fresh
  • Faster iteration between interviews (“learn → refine guide → interview again”)
  • Less project drag when you’re handling many recordings

“It wasn’t just text, it was formatted the way I actually need for analysis.”

A common complaint about transcription outputs is that they arrive as a single dense paragraph, making them painful to code or quote from.

What users tend to appreciate about Goarif’s transcript format is that it’s closer to a dataset than a document:

  • Timestamps for traceability (so quotes are easy to verify)
  • Row, by, row verbatim (better for coding and thematic analysis)
  • Speaker diarization (so “who said what” is clearer, especially in interviews)

In qualitative work, credibility often comes down to evidence handling. Users often mention that timestamps and structure reduce anxiety around misquoting, selective paraphrasing, or losing track of where a claim came from.

“It handled real Indonesian speech better than I expected.”

For Indonesian, language interviews, the challenge isn’t just transcription, it’s how people speak: daily slang, informal phrasing, abbreviations, regional expressions, and sometimes code, switching.

Users doing field interviews or consumer conversations often say they’re cautious about tools that only work well on formal speech. What makes Goarif feel more usable in practice is its Indonesian, focused NLP approach, including models adapted for day, to, day and nationally common slang, not only textbook Bahasa.

In typical interview conditions, users can expect transcript accuracy of at least ~90%, though they also recognize accuracy depends on audio quality, overlap, accents, and background noise. The practical takeaway users describe is the transcript is usually strong enough to move straight into analysis, with only light review rather than a full re-listen.

“The real time, saver wasn’t just transcription, it was what I could do next.”
Where users start sounding most enthusiastic is after the transcript comes back. Because ARIF’s Transcribe feature provides Chat with your Data, they don’t have to treat transcripts like static text. They can treat them like analyzable material.

Users typically describe workflows like:

Summaries that still feel grounded

  • “Summarize this interview into key points, but keep it evidence, based.”
  • “Give me a stakeholder, ready summary and include supporting quotes with timestamps.”
  • “Summarize by section: motivations, barriers, decision drivers, unmet needs.”

Themes and thematic structure (not just keywords)

  • “What themes keep repeating?”
  • “Group the responses into themes and sub, themes.”
  • “Show me representative quotes for each theme.”

Emotion and sentiment, useful for interviews, not just social media

  • “Where did they sound frustrated or uncertain?”
  • “Which parts show excitement or confidence?”
  • “Highlight emotionally intense moments I should quote.”

Bias and framing checks (for research rigor)

This one matters for credibility. Users like being able to sanity, check:

  • Leading or loaded questions
  • Overgeneralizations and stereotypes
  • Confirmation bias patterns (e.g., reinforcing one narrative repeatedly)
  • Contradictions between what people say and what they describe doing

“It basically removed the most tedious part of qualitative work.”

When users talk about the overall impact, they rarely frame it as “AI magic.” They frame it as time recovered and rigor improved:

  • Less time transcribing and re-listening
  • Faster turnaround from interview → findings
  • Clearer traceability (timestamps + structured outputs)
  • Easier synthesis across multiple transcripts
  • More bandwidth to focus on analysis, not mechanics

The consistent theme from researchers and students is simple: it makes qualitative research feel more scalable, without losing the evidence trail that makes findings credible.

In the end, ARIF’s Transcribe doesn’t replace the researcher. It removes the bottleneck, so you can spend your time doing what matters: interpreting, validating, and turning human stories into defensible insights.

ARIF’s Transcribe Analysis Workflow

The workflow is straightforward to follow.

  1. Select Analysis: Choose the Transcribe Analysis from the drop-down.
  1. Data: Upload the audio or MP4 file that contains your intended conversation. Alternatively, you can append the URL file such as Google Drive or YouTube URL link.
  1. Run: Execute once and wait for the results.
  2. Outputs:
    1. Transcription Result
    2. Translation to English/Indonesia
    3. Chat with Results
  3. Act: Decide the action whatever your business needs.

Summary

ARIF’s Transcribe Analysis converts recordings into a structured transcript with timestamps and speaker names, which shortens review time and makes minute preparation straightforward. Translation and Excel export are available when needed, and the workflow fits routine reviews, research interviews, sales or support calls, and training or policy sessions. For best results, keep audio clear, reference timestamps in your notes, and review sensitive content before sharing.

Want to give it a try? Visit goarif.co.

Stop Guessing, Start Knowing.

Get clear, confident answers from your data in minutes with ARIF,
the no-code AI data analytics tool.

Share this article

About the Author

C

Cornellius Yudha Wijaya

Analytics Expert & Content Creator

With over 7 years of hands-on experience in data science, I provide specialized consultation in data science, machine learning, and AI implementation.

Join hundreds of professionals who use ARIF
to make smarter, data-driven decisions

Free 5 analysis or 30 day access, whichever comes first.

No credit card required. Cancel anytime!